Heritability of types of a pregeometry relative to a family of relational structures

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31489/2026m1/169-178

Keywords:

pregeometry, Boolean algebra, degeneracy, modularity, local finiteness, algebraic closure, relational structure, intersection of structures, union of structures

Abstract

A series of geometrical and topological properties induced by structures, including degeneration, modularity, local modularity, projectivity, local finiteness, etc., play an important role in clarifying structural relationships and in classifying basic and derivative semantical and syntactical objects related to a given class of structures and their valuable characteristics. It is natural to turn to the family of all structures on a given finite or infinite universe, which allows us to represent all possible structures of a given cardinality up to the definability and to describe relationships, possibilities of preserving and violating structural properties during enrichments and restrictions of structures within the framework of the chosen family. This paper studies the behavior of pregeometry types (degenerate, locally finite, modular) within the Boolean algebra B(M) of regular expansions and reducts of a relational structure M. We establish criteria for the inheritance of pregeometry properties under Boolean operations, proving that degeneracy and local finiteness are preserved under intersections. In contrast, we show through counterexamples that modularity generally fails to be preserved, as does local finiteness under unions. We formulate a sufficient condition of linear growth of the closure operator under which the union of locally finite structures remains locally finite. These results reveal a fundamental asymmetry between intersection and union operations, contributing to geometric stability theory by delineating the preservation boundaries of pregeometries in Boolean families of structures.

References

1 Zilber, B.I. (1980). Strongly minimal countably categorical theories. Siberian Mathematical Journal, 21(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00968268

2 Zilber, B.I. (1984). Strongly minimal countably categorical theories II. Siberian Mathematical Journal, 25(3), 396–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00968979

3 Zilber, B.I. (1984). Strongly minimal countably categorical theories III. Siberian Mathematical Journal, 25(4), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00968893

4 Zilber, B. (1986). Structural properties of models of ω1-categorical theories. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VII. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 115–128.

5 Pillay, A. (1996). Geometric Stability Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

6 Hrushovski, E. (1993) A new strongly minimal set. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 62(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0072(93)90171-9

7 Cherlin, G., Harrington, L., & Lachlan, A.H. (1986). ℵ0-categorical, ℵ0-stable structures. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 28(2), 103–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0072(85)90023-5

8 Hodges, W. (1994). Model theory. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications (Vol. 42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9 Berenstein, A., & Vassiliev, E. (2016). Geometric structures with a dense independent subset. Selecta Mathematica, 22(1), 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-015-0190-1

10 Mukhopadhyay, M.M., & Vassiliev, E. (2019). On the Vamos matroid, homogeneous pregeometries and dense pairs. Australian Journal of Combinatorics, 75(1), 158–170.

11 Yeshkeyev, A.R., Issaeva, A.K., & Popova N.V. (2020). Closure of special atomic subsets of semantic model. Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Mathematics Series, 1(97), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.31489/2020M1/97-103

12 Yeshkeyev, A.R., Kassymetova, M.T., & Ulbrikht, O.I. (2021). Independence and simplicity in Jonsson theories with abstract geometry. Siberian Electronic Mathematical Reports, 18(1), 433–455. https://doi.org/10.33048/semi.2021.18.030

13 Sudoplatov, S.V. (2016). Closures and generating sets related to combinations of structures. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, 16, 131–144.

14 Pavlyuk, In.I. (2024). On algebraic and definable closures for theories of abelian groups. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, 47, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.26516/19977670.2024.47.107

15 Sudoplatov, S.V. (2018). Combinations of structures. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, 24, 82–101. https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2018.24.82

16 Emel’yanov, D.Y., Kulpeshov, B.Sh., & Sudoplatov, S.V. (2020). Algebras of binary formulas for compositions of theories. Algebra and Logic, 59(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469020-09602-y

17 Emelyanov, D.Yu. (2022). Algebras of binary isolating formulas for tensor product theories. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, 41, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2022.41.131

18 Emelyanov, D.Yu. (2023). Algebras of binary isolating formulas for strong product theories. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, 45, 138–144. https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2023.45.138

19 Emelyanov, D.Yu. (2025). Algebras of binary isolating formulas for homomorphic product theories. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, 52, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2025.52.153

20 Kulpeshov, B.Sh. (2023). Algebras of binary formulas for ℵ0-categorical weakly circularly minimal theories: piecewise monotonic case. Siberian Electronic Mathematical Reports, 20(2), 824– 832. https://doi.org/10.33048/semi.2023.20.049

21 Kulpeshov, B.Sh. (2024). Algebras of binary formulas for weakly circularly minimal theories with trivial definable closure. Siberian Mathematical Journal, 65(2), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0037446624020071

22 Kulpeshov, B.Sh. (2025). Algebras of binary formulas for weakly circularly minimal theories with equivalence relations. Eurasian Mathematical Journal, 16(3), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.32523/2077-9879-2025-16-3-42-56

23 Hasson, A., & Hils, M. (2006). Fusion over sublanguages. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 71(2), 361–398. https://doi.org/10.2178/jsl/1146620149

24 Sudoplatov, S.V. (2025). Expansions and restrictions of structures and theories, their hierarchies. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, 54, 143–159. https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2025.54.143

25 Malyshev, S.B. (2025). Nasleduemost tipov predgeometrii otnositelno kompozitsii struktur [Heritability of Types of Pregeometry with Respect to Compositions of Structures]. Izvestiia Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia «Matematika» — The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series «Mathematics», 52, 162–174 [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2025.52.162

Downloads

Published

30.03.2026

How to Cite

Malyshev, S.B., & Sudoplatov, S.V. (2026). Heritability of types of a pregeometry relative to a family of relational structures. Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Mathematics Series, 1(121), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.31489/2026m1/169-178

Issue

Section

MATHEMATICS